Über Desi

Keeping it real, desi ishtyle

Slumdog Millionaire: The offensive reviews

TAGS: None

Movie starts.

Scene: Young man hanging from ceiling being tortured by Mumbai police.
Review: I’m offended. This is showing Mumbai police in bad light especially in the light of the heroism they displayed during the recent terror attacks. So this shows India in a poor light.

Scene: Mumbai police call young man “slumdog”.
Review: I’m offended. How dare they compare a slum dweller to a dog? So this shows India in a poor light.

Scene: Boy performs his daily habits through hole in the ground in a shed overlooking a cliff.
Review: I’m offended. Thinking to self: not sure why. Oh wait, this shows India in a poor light.

Scene: Boy dives into pile of human excretion to get Amitabh Bachchan’s autograph.
Review: I’m offended. As a Amitabh fan, I can attest to the fact that he would never sign autographs for people covered in human excretions. So this shows India in a poor light.

Scene: Boy’s mother killed by Hindu rioters.
Review: I’m offended. People like Narendra Modi and Bal Thackeray have repeatedly told us, it was “them” not us. So this shows India in a poor light.

Scene: Boy and brother live amongst garbage, filth and squalor.
Review: I’m offended. I live in high rise apartments and shop in shiny malls. So this shows India in a poor light.

By now you probably get the point. 2 out of every 3 reviews we read on the desi blogosphere or the desi media seems to be someone being offended by the movie “Slumdog Millionaire”, rather than concentrating on the merits and demerits of the movie – story, acting, cinematography, soundtrack – itself.

This one pretty much represents those kind of reviews. The underlying theme to these arguments seem to be “I live in high rise apartments and shop in shiny malls. Why don’t they ever show this in Western movies with Indian themes?”.

They do. Those movies while not half bad, did not win any major awards. See: Monsoon Wedding, for instance, showcasing the lavish weddings that happen in upper middle class families. Do movie makers have to stick to a certain agenda, i.e. showcasing the wealthy Indian middle class or the über rich?

Whether, the poverty angle of “Slumdog Millionaire” played a part in terms of award recognition is up for debate. But why does seeing poverty and slums on-screen bother so many Indians? By unequivocally suggesting that somehow showing the poor of India on-screen, harms the reputation of the country, aren’t these critics, most of them middle class or higher, being elitist?

What do you think? Thoughts. Opinions.

P.S. Just to further antagonize these elitist critics and drum up more support for the movie, particularly among the desi (and non-desi) male population, we bring to you saxy” pictures of Frieda Pinto. (tip via email)

Looks like you are one of our regular visitors. Here is our RSS feed, just another way to keep up with the new posts.

TAGS: None

  • Excellently written article, if only all bloggers offered the same content as you, the internet would be a much better place. Please keep it up! Cheers.
  • Well there is extreme poverty in every country on earth, so I do not see why people are offended when it is portrayed in their own country. American movies for years have shown the disparities in wealth. Even comedies such as Adventures in Babysitting show these differences.
  • First of all, I have to say, I saw the movie and enjoyed it very much. I personally know that a lot of the things depicted DO happen, though not to everyone, nor all the time, and I, knowing this movie is based on a novel, took the movie as an entertaining work of fiction about a boy who struggled a lot and got a happy ending.

    I think the reason many Indians felt offended by this film has to do with it's depiction of poverty as the main background for the film. I can understand this, because a lot of people in the world, who do not bother to educate themselves about the world, hold a lot of really silly stereotypes about India... People ask me all the time things like "Oh, India, everyone there lives, in like, mud huts, right?" or "Are like like cities and stuff in India? I mean, like electricity and everything?"

    With such inane questions, I can understand why people would think "oh God! another popular movie about India which only shows poverty, now people will keep asking such stupid questions, without bothering to education themselves about how India actually is!" This can be frustrating.

    At the same time, I feel like not EVERYONE who watches the movie is going to assume that is how ALL of India is, ALL the time. I watch movies about countries I don't know very much about all the time, and I don't naturally assume that what is depicted in the film is how life is. I'm sure that at least a good portion of people would do the same.

    Another thing about this "It depicts India in a bad light" argument is how many Indians I have talked to who do the same for the U.S...

    Maybe their fear comes from the fact that many people see Hollywood films and build all of these stereotypes on that such as 1.When you walk down the street you see people shooting each other all the time. 2. American women will sleep with anyone if you are nice to them for .5 seconds. or 3. Americans will see someone suffering on the street, and just ignore them, right?

    Anyways, my point is, for any country's film industry, we can build incorrect stereotypes about a country.

    Maybe people just need to realize movies and movies, and not worry so much!
  • When a film such as this is not really an Indian production (don't be fooled by Anil Kapoor accepting a SAG award on behalf of the cast), one can't expect it to as sensitive and inoffensive as we might like. What is more troubling to me about the hype surrounding this film is that it does lack in technical and artistic merit. I frankly don't care whether some privileged Indians would rather see their own high-rises in films (maybe Bollywood can take care of that more respectably?) then watch poverty sell. What they should be concerned about is the lack of quality cinema being produced in India itself, and the lack of film-making for the international audience. If you look at India's last few offerings for the Oscars, they were rather dismal. Why don't more Indians produce films that are more "sensitive" and "realistic"?
  • NSK
    Slumdog Millionaire offended me because it was cliched, cloying, and cute. The movie is written for hand-wringing, guilty-feeling, white people who want their views on current-day India reinforced in film. Most tellingly, these same white people want to feel good when they leave the theatre, and Slumdog achieved that end in spades.

    There's nothing remotely revolutionary, important, artistic, or thoughtful about this film. That said, I guess it's notable that a white guy has made what basically amounts to a Bollywood film and that the world has taken notice.
  • v
    I don't have problems with this movie at all. Yea there were bad scenes about India, but the director showed what he needed to. He didn't go out of his way to show Indian people eating snakes like the Temple of Doom movie.
  • Ka
    I do agree that few of the scenes in the movie are definitely not good to see.

    However, most of them are happening in India. It's not that none of them are happening and all are just made by director.

    Don't you see police torturing innocent people in India? Don't you agree the slum life which is clearly show in picture? Don't you think most of the TV shows, awards are not based on performance and based on money? Don't you agree many of the Mumbai mafia leaders are behaving like that?

    It's just that as an Indian we will not be able to digest. But most of the scenes in the picture are true....

    Again, this is just my opening based on my experience with Mumbai for about 6 years. But still I do vote for MUMBAI as the greatest city in the world.
blog comments powered by Disqus

© 2009 Über Desi. All Rights Reserved.

This blog is powered by Wordpress and Magatheme by Bryan Helmig.